* Login   * Register
It is currently Thu Jul 31, 2014 1:37 pm

View unanswered posts | View active topics



All times are UTC - 8 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic


 Post subject: End closed primaries
PostPosted: Sat Aug 27, 2011 10:32 pm 
Offline
Senior Member

Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2011 5:36 pm
Posts: 709
Location: Louisiana
One area where some practical effort could be made is to limit the power the parties have in selecting candidates for us. In just about every state it is VERY hard (read: impossible unless you have a millions of dollars to spend) for a potential candidate to get on the ballot for a state wide election without winning either the Democratic or Republican primary for the office.

A way to break this headlock the parties have on the elections process would be to do away with state funding or recognition of party primaries. If a party wants to hold an election to see who will receive the party's support, fine. The election, however, will be on the party's nickel; the state will not help in any way and the winner will get no special treatment regarding placement on the ballot.

What would happen is the state holds an "open" primary. That is, all candidates for a particular office appear on the election ballot. If no candidate receives a majority of the votes then the two candidates with the highest number of votes goes on to a runoff. This means voters could be choosing between two candidates from the same party. It also means that while party support would certainly still be important, a small number of activists within the party system won't be able to limit the electorate's choice to only candidates that are activist approved.

Now, since both state and federal elections are actually regulated at the state level the bar for making changes are somewhat lower. In my own state of Louisiana we managed to get back to an open primary system after a dismal 4 year experiment with the closed primary system. Despite strong opposition by both national parties enough popular pressure was placed on the state legislature to roll the election process back to open primaries. One result is neither of our current US Senators jobs (both Landrieu and Vitter were elected via closed primaries) are secure.

_________________
"I experimented with Masculinism when I was younger but it made me feel like such a sniveling pussy, I had to give it up." - Glasperlenspieler


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: End closed primaries
PostPosted: Sat Aug 27, 2011 10:53 pm 
Offline
Archon
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 13, 2008 9:21 pm
Posts: 34781
Just abolish political factions from federal elections. They can have their primaries if they want. But it shouldn't ever show up on a federal ballot, and shouldn't have anything to do with political parties. Just put a name on the ballot. Nor should the election commissions be controlled by party members.

In the meantime, simply encourage people to not vote for democrats or republicans. The day Americans stop voting for those people is the day these problems actually lesson instead of worsen.

_________________
“If the human race is to survive, then for all but a very brief period of its history, the word ship will mean space ship.” –Arthur C. Clarke


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: End closed primaries
PostPosted: Sun Aug 28, 2011 12:05 am 
Offline
Senior Member

Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2011 5:36 pm
Posts: 709
Location: Louisiana
Effectively that's what would happen if the states stopped using party primaries to "screen" candidates for office. Parties would in the end become basically a PAC like they were prior to the 1950s.

_________________
"I experimented with Masculinism when I was younger but it made me feel like such a sniveling pussy, I had to give it up." - Glasperlenspieler


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: End closed primaries
PostPosted: Tue Nov 08, 2011 6:31 pm 
Offline
Contributing Member

Joined: Tue Nov 08, 2011 4:25 pm
Posts: 75
I do agree with Open Primaries, but we need to use approval voting for that. The regular runoff method still has the problems of vote splitting and you can get the two worst candidates in the general. With approval voting you get the two best candidates in the general election.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: End closed primaries
PostPosted: Tue Nov 08, 2011 7:43 pm 
Offline
Hetairoi
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 9:25 pm
Posts: 7951
blahface wrote:
I do agree with Open Primaries, but we need to use approval voting for that. The regular runoff method still has the problems of vote splitting and you can get the two worst candidates in the general. With approval voting you get the two best candidates in the general election.
+1

I think you're the first person other than myself I've seen on here recognizing this, and it is absolutely correct. Let parties have whatever "primary" process they want. Without control over the ballot who cares what method a PAC uses to pick its favored candidate? Like Strangelove said, prohibit anything on the ballot but the name of the candidate. If someone wants to vote based on their political organization's recommendations they can bring in a list of names to vote for.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  


Post new topic Reply to topic

All times are UTC - 8 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group


Home l Common Sense l Hardcore History l Donate l Community l Merchandise l Blog l About Us