NPR to ditch the falsehood of BALANCE, instead embrace TRUTH

What's going on in the world today?

Moderators: Loki, exposno1, Parrot, Quasigriz, NickDupree, nmoore63, robroydude, Spinny Spamkiller

Re: NPR to ditch the falsehood of BALANCE, instead embrace T

Postby raistian77 » Sun Mar 04, 2012 7:35 pm

In modern times Mr. Rodgers would be under investigation.

The days of Mr. Rodgers, Captain Kangaroo and Mr. Green Jeans is long over. Now it's the era of Sponge Bob Square pants (and I still have no fucking idea what that show is supposed to teach) along with other A.D.D. programing.
:shakinghead:


My biggest issue with Fox came along during the beginning of the Iraq war.

The guest host was Ann Coulter (crazy train) and she made a comment that anyone protesting the war was a traitor and should be dealt with as such. The other hosts agreed and added that to question a war time president should be a crime.

Now fast forward to present time.

Fox continuously bashes Obama over the war and questions him daily,

What happened to not questioning a war time president? Guess that only counts if the war time president has a R before his name.
The fool doth think he is wise, but the wise man knows himself to be a fool.

Oh Wait, You're Serious? Let Me Laugh Even Harder!

-"No matter how bad things seem--- "
"They could be worse."
"Nope. No matter how bad they seem, they can't be any better, and they can't be any worse, because that's the way things fucking are, and you better get used to it, Nancy. Quit yer bitching."
User avatar
raistian77
Hetairoi
 
Posts: 6816
Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 8:33 pm
Location: Clarksville, TN

Re: NPR to ditch the falsehood of BALANCE, instead embrace T

Postby WCMeyer » Sun Mar 04, 2012 7:46 pm

raistian77 wrote:In modern times Mr. Rodgers would be under investigation.

The days of Mr. Rodgers, Captain Kangaroo and Mr. Green Jeans is long over. Now it's the era of Sponge Bob Square pants (and I still have no fucking idea what that show is supposed to teach) along with other A.D.D. programing.
:shakinghead:


My biggest issue with Fox came along during the beginning of the Iraq war.

The guest host was Ann Coulter (crazy train) and she made a comment that anyone protesting the war was a traitor and should be dealt with as such. The other hosts agreed and added that to question a war time president should be a crime.

Now fast forward to present time.

Fox continuously bashes Obama over the war and questions him daily,

What happened to not questioning a war time president? Guess that only counts if the war time president has a R before his name.


It's sad that we have to look at Mr. Rogers from a modern lens; a lens in which any man who has compassion for children and wishes to teach them simple life lessons is a Sandusky.

The man was simply good human:

This is the best time of day, the dawn, the final cleansing breath unsullied yet by acrid fumes or death's cacophony, the rank refuse of unchained ambition. And pray, deny me not, but know me now: your faithful retainer stands resolute to serve his liege Lord without recompense, perchance to fall and perish namelessly. No flag draped bier or muffled drum to set the cadence for a final dress parade. But it was not always thus, remember? Once you worshiped me and named me a God in many tongues, lest I exact too terrible a tribute.
User avatar
WCMeyer
Senior Member
 
Posts: 946
Joined: Tue Aug 16, 2011 7:37 pm
Location: Lawrence, KS

Re: NPR to ditch the falsehood of BALANCE, instead embrace T

Postby raistian77 » Sun Mar 04, 2012 8:05 pm

Oh, I agree

Hopefully not dating myself to badly, I grew up watching him and Sesame Street and many other programs that are gone and mostly forgotten.
The fool doth think he is wise, but the wise man knows himself to be a fool.

Oh Wait, You're Serious? Let Me Laugh Even Harder!

-"No matter how bad things seem--- "
"They could be worse."
"Nope. No matter how bad they seem, they can't be any better, and they can't be any worse, because that's the way things fucking are, and you better get used to it, Nancy. Quit yer bitching."
User avatar
raistian77
Hetairoi
 
Posts: 6816
Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 8:33 pm
Location: Clarksville, TN

Re: NPR to ditch the falsehood of BALANCE, instead embrace T

Postby sventoby » Sun Mar 04, 2012 9:41 pm

Everybody is so afraid of everyone else because of the way the media reports on everything. If I based my view of people who work with children on what I see on TV I'd assume that at least half are pedophiles.
User avatar
sventoby
Senior Member
 
Posts: 509
Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2011 11:09 am

Re: NPR to ditch the falsehood of BALANCE, instead embrace T

Postby godslabrat » Tue Mar 06, 2012 10:40 am

I listened to the All Things Considered podcast back during the 2008 election. While what I heard may not have been representative of the whole program, it was enough to turn me off. One show in particular had me fuming. The topic was "Politically Divided Households", and callers were supposed to describe what it was like to be opposed to your spouse's viewpoints. HOWEVER, all the calls ended up being one partner who liked Hillary, the other who liked Obama. It wasn't a matter of liberal or conservative, it was just which particular flavor of liberal you wanted to be. I found this to be a complete waste of my time.
User avatar
godslabrat
Contributing Member
 
Posts: 341
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 7:30 pm

Re: NPR to ditch the falsehood of BALANCE, instead embrace T

Postby hondo69 » Wed Mar 07, 2012 8:34 pm

I wonder if one of the All Things They Considered was to pay back the taxpayers for all the years they pretended to be unbiased. Since they're out of the closet now and mostly self-sufficent we should put them on a monthly payment plan.
Fugitive from the law of averages
User avatar
hondo69
Nomarch
 
Posts: 1860
Joined: Mon Apr 18, 2011 3:06 am
Location: Austin, TX

Re: NPR to ditch the falsehood of BALANCE, instead embrace T

Postby Waleis » Wed Mar 07, 2012 8:56 pm

hondo69 wrote:I wonder if one of the All Things They Considered was to pay back the taxpayers for all the years they pretended to be unbiased. Since they're out of the closet now and mostly self-sufficent we should put them on a monthly payment plan.

Exactly. NPR should be financially punished for attempting to be less partisan than other news outlets.
"No man grows rich by kindness."-Jorah Mormont

"True heroism is you, alone, in a designated workspace. True heroism is minutes, hours, days, year upon year of the quiet, precise, judicious exercise of probity and care, with no one there to see or cheer." The Pale King, by D. F. Wallace.
User avatar
Waleis
Hetairoi
 
Posts: 9766
Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2009 5:32 am
Location: Dragonstone, Iowa

Re: NPR to ditch the falsehood of BALANCE, instead embrace T

Postby Dr. Strangelove » Wed Mar 07, 2012 9:14 pm

I think Sean Hannity ought to be given a Presidential Medal of Freedom and a fifteen million dollar Arts and Culture Grant for his dedication to partisanship and hackery. That will show those evil NPR folk.
“If the human race is to survive, then for all but a very brief period of its history, the word ship will mean space ship.” –Arthur C. Clarke
User avatar
Dr. Strangelove
Archon
 
Posts: 36644
Joined: Sun Apr 13, 2008 10:21 pm

Re: NPR to ditch the falsehood of BALANCE, instead embrace T

Postby hondo69 » Thu Mar 08, 2012 4:40 am

Though the above two posts are obviously sarcastic I might argue there's a hint of truth hiding in there somewhere.

NPR proudly boasts "we are unbiased" but we all know that's about as far from the truth as Obama saying he's looking out for the little guy. Sean Hannity claims to be fair and balanced but is obviously nothing of the sort. Both parties are engaging in the exact same bait and switch tactics, just from opposite sides of the fence.

So yes, providing Sean Hannity with 5% federal funding would be a fair and equitable use of taxpayer dollars.

And it would tickle me to no end to watch the liberals quaking in their Birkenstocks as some Republican Congressman introduces a bill to provide federal funding for Fox News. Now would actually be an opportune time to introduce such a bill. It would shift the national conversation away from the goofball demanding her university pay for her birth control pills. Fluke, Flouk, Flick, whatever the hell her name is could testify before Congress just as if she's Rosa Parks and explain why Fox News has ruined her life. I might even switch my TV over from American Pickers and Swamp People to watch that circus show.
Fugitive from the law of averages
User avatar
hondo69
Nomarch
 
Posts: 1860
Joined: Mon Apr 18, 2011 3:06 am
Location: Austin, TX

Re: NPR to ditch the falsehood of BALANCE, instead embrace T

Postby drtrech » Thu Mar 08, 2012 6:43 am

NPR = Sean Hannity . . .

:lol: :lol: :lol: :roll: :lol: :lol: :lol:
User avatar
drtrech
Archon
 
Posts: 27810
Joined: Fri Dec 01, 2006 8:22 pm
Location: Mississippi

Re: NPR to ditch the falsehood of BALANCE, instead embrace T

Postby Harry K » Thu Mar 08, 2012 7:04 am

drtrech wrote:NPR = Sean Hannity . . .

:lol: :lol: :lol: :roll: :lol: :lol: :lol:


Dementia comes in all forms. Even Alice in Wonderlan Syndrome 293.89.

:snicker:
Merlin: Looking at the cake is like looking at the future, until you've tasted it what do you really know? And then, of course, it's too late.

[Arthur takes a bite]

Merlin: Too late.


"Quiet desperation is the drtech way,
The time is gone, the gun is handed over,
Thought you'd had something more to say."
User avatar
Harry K
Archon
 
Posts: 12740
Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2010 5:59 pm

Re: NPR to ditch the falsehood of BALANCE, instead embrace T

Postby drtrech » Thu Mar 08, 2012 7:18 am

godslabrat wrote:I listened to the All Things Considered podcast back during the 2008 election. While what I heard may not have been representative of the whole program, it was enough to turn me off. One show in particular had me fuming. The topic was "Politically Divided Households", and callers were supposed to describe what it was like to be opposed to your spouse's viewpoints. HOWEVER, all the calls ended up being one partner who liked Hillary, the other who liked Obama. It wasn't a matter of liberal or conservative, it was just which particular flavor of liberal you wanted to be. I found this to be a complete waste of my time.

Are you sure that ALL the calls ended up as a Hillary vs Obama situation? Or was that your skewed perception?
Is it possible that you didn't listen to the entire show?
Is it possible that the actual stated focus of the show was intentionally that narrow as it was covering the Democratic primaries, and so the calls were consistent with the intended and stated scope of the show?

Without hearing the show, there's no way to know if it's the show that was biased, or your perception of it.
User avatar
drtrech
Archon
 
Posts: 27810
Joined: Fri Dec 01, 2006 8:22 pm
Location: Mississippi

Re: NPR to ditch the falsehood of BALANCE, instead embrace T

Postby Atanamis » Thu Mar 08, 2012 7:52 am

drtrech wrote:Are you sure that ALL the calls ended up as a Hillary vs Obama situation? Or was that your skewed perception?
Is it possible that you didn't listen to the entire show?
Is it possible that the actual stated focus of the show was intentionally that narrow as it was covering the Democratic primaries, and so the calls were consistent with the intended and stated scope of the show?
The listener base of NPR skews left (in part due to the right wing mentality that it is evil). If they were doing call ins, it is entirely possible the callers also skewed left. I'm not sure what deep value he expected from a call in of families talking about internal political differences anyway. It seems like a silly topic to begin with. I don't really know that it makes sense to blame NPR other than for the silly topic choice.
User avatar
Atanamis
Hetairoi
 
Posts: 8042
Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:25 pm

Re: NPR to ditch the falsehood of BALANCE, instead embrace T

Postby drtrech » Thu Mar 08, 2012 8:02 am

Atanamis wrote:
drtrech wrote:Are you sure that ALL the calls ended up as a Hillary vs Obama situation? Or was that your skewed perception?
Is it possible that you didn't listen to the entire show?
Is it possible that the actual stated focus of the show was intentionally that narrow as it was covering the Democratic primaries, and so the calls were consistent with the intended and stated scope of the show?
The listener base of NPR skews left (in part due to the right wing mentality that it is evil). If they were doing call ins, it is entirely possible the callers also skewed left. I'm not sure what deep value he expected from a call in of families talking about internal political differences anyway. It seems like a silly topic to begin with. I don't really know that it makes sense to blame NPR other than for the silly topic choice.

Agreed.

My only real point was that we don't know this wasn't a case of confirmation bias.

Anecdote is anecdote.
User avatar
drtrech
Archon
 
Posts: 27810
Joined: Fri Dec 01, 2006 8:22 pm
Location: Mississippi

Re: NPR to ditch the falsehood of BALANCE, instead embrace T

Postby DBTrek » Thu Mar 08, 2012 9:14 am

Harry K wrote:
drtrech wrote:NPR = Sean Hannity . . .

:lol: :lol: :lol: :roll: :lol: :lol: :lol:


Dementia comes in all forms. Even Alice in Wonderlan Syndrome 293.89.

:snicker:


To the right-wing, uneducated, indoctrinated zealot anyone to the left of Hannity is a goddamn liberal.

lulz
Excuses sound best to the person that's making them up. -Tyrese Gibson
User avatar
DBTrek
Archon
 
Posts: 27140
Joined: Wed May 09, 2007 5:37 pm
Location: Seattle

PreviousNext

Return to Current Events

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Yahoo [Bot] and 10 guests