by Doondi69 » Sat Jan 07, 2012 4:55 pm
by robin » Sat Jan 07, 2012 5:26 pm
by exposno1 » Sat Jan 07, 2012 5:32 pm
robin wrote:"BEN" GET BACK TO WORK. . . NOW!
by Quasigriz » Sat Jan 07, 2012 5:33 pm
by Dan » Sat Jan 07, 2012 5:43 pm
by Chris73 » Sat Jan 07, 2012 7:08 pm
Doondi69 wrote:It ...<blah, blah, blah>... would be the same.
by de officiis » Sat Jan 07, 2012 7:37 pm
by Kath » Sat Jan 07, 2012 7:43 pm
de officiis wrote:Are we to assume that bringing federal spending under control will mean the repeal of the CRA of 1964 or the failure to fund the EEOC? Also, don't most states have their own civil rights statutes on the books?
Doondi69 wrote: Its been 400 years since whites could own property or have equal rights. Did that financial foundation prevent their children from prospering"?
by pilot_mkn » Sat Jan 07, 2012 8:12 pm
by Dan » Sat Jan 07, 2012 8:16 pm
pilot_mkn wrote:You know what would happen if you put up that "whites only" sign if there were no Civil Rights Act?
The same thing that happened to Go Daddy when it came out in support of SOPA: your name gets plastered all over the news and your customers take their money elsewhere and now everyone knows you're a bigot.
by Doondi69 » Sun Jan 08, 2012 3:02 pm
robin wrote:Welcome to the community. Are you referring to the history episode on Magellan? Just curious how long you have been festering. I am also not sure I would be giving "Ben" assignments until the next HH episode is out. He might get the idea that he can procrastinate on finishing the episode.
"BEN" GET BACK TO WORK. . . NOW!
by Doondi69 » Sun Jan 08, 2012 3:13 pm
exposno1 wrote:robin wrote:"BEN" GET BACK TO WORK. . . NOW!
You okay, man?
. . . oh, and welcome, Doondi . . . you may want to loosen the grip, a bit!
by Doondi69 » Sun Jan 08, 2012 3:20 pm
Quasigriz wrote:Welcome aboard!
the little secret is that Obama doesn't care about you or your liberties no matter what color your skin is.
Both Republicans and Democrats are only concerned with wealth and power. Both people marginalize the populace; catering to the wealthy while supressing the poor. Bey both have there seperate reasons for doing so.
Good luck getting anyone else to post on this thread. :hug:
by Doondi69 » Sun Jan 08, 2012 3:34 pm
Dan wrote:Well, Ben told me about it (if he exists) and all I can tell the OP is that he should find a libertarian to yell at. No self-respecting libertarian would let me darken their door (I still get angry emails after saying I favored some sort of government health care system, a la Europe or Canada).
I am a civil libertarian (civil libertarian noun: a person who actively supports or works for the protection or expansion of civil liberties.) not an economic libertarian. I am a fan of the ACLU, not the Mises institute.
by Doondi69 » Sun Jan 08, 2012 3:43 pm
Chris73 wrote:Doondi69 wrote:It ...<blah, blah, blah>... would be the same.