* Login   * Register
It is currently Wed Apr 16, 2014 2:10 am

View unanswered posts | View active topics



All times are UTC - 8 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic


 Post subject: Dan Carlin & Rick Santorum; separated at birth?
PostPosted: Thu Feb 09, 2012 3:49 pm 
Offline
Hetairoi
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 16, 2007 10:27 pm
Posts: 5080
Location: Austin, Texas
...and I suggest that based on Santorum's recent tirade;
Quote:
“They are taking faith and crushing it. Why? Why? When you marginalize faith in America, when you remove the pillar of God given rights then what’s left?” Santorum asked and an audience member offered, “Communism!”

“The French Revolution,” Santorum answered. “What’s left is a government that gives you rights. What’s left are no unalienable rights. What’s left is a government that will tell you who you are, what you’ll do and when you’ll do it. What’s left in France became the guillotine. Ladies and gentlemen, we are a long way from that, but if we do follow the path of President Obama and his overt hostility to faith in America, then we are headed down that road.”
http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/02/rick-santorum-draws-crowds-raises-nearly-1-million-after-tuesday-trifecta/
As a reflection of the argument from http://dancarlin.com/phpbb3/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=30831 where I was viciously attacked by members for suggesting that we needed to separate our arguments from the language of religion, and where Dan poo-pooed my concern with "everyone knows what I mean". Yes. Santorum agrees with you. Completely.

_________________
"I unsettle all things. No facts are to me sacred; none are profane; I simply experiment, an endless seeker with no past at my back." - Ralph Waldo Emerson

Calling it quits? We are the Message Board Whores. Get used to it.
The Reason for the Decline


Last edited by RAnthony on Sun Mar 25, 2012 12:47 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Dan Carlin & Rick Santorum; seperated at birth?
PostPosted: Thu Feb 09, 2012 4:29 pm 
Offline
Hetairoi
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 30, 2010 3:50 pm
Posts: 7299
If human rights come from government, then government can take them away.
If human rights come from God, then government can still take them away with enough force.

But, for some reason, people who think they have God-given rights will defend them more vigorously than people who think their rights come from government beneficence.

Is it shocking both Dan and Rick can see the simple logic there?

_________________
"Yuck factor aside (along with the potential for the animal to harm the human), if the animal isn't being harmed I'm not sure why bestiality should be a felony." -- drtrech

"Boethius was the only user here to successfully piss me off IRL, and you'll notice it's been crickets from him for a while. I'm not saying he's dead now . . . but . . . :twisted:" -- DBTrek

"How about you just suck on a cyanide lollipop and spare us your fucking hyperbole you whining little nancy?" -- Cid

"If Dan had a lick of sense he'd have booted your pompous ass ages ago." - RAnthony


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Dan Carlin & Rick Santorum; seperated at birth?
PostPosted: Thu Feb 09, 2012 5:17 pm 
Offline
Hetairoi
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 16, 2007 10:27 pm
Posts: 5080
Location: Austin, Texas
Neither opinion is actually true;
Quote:
I had so many different issues with this episode, it's hard to name them all, Dan. Inalienable rights come from god? No. They are emergent principles of human nature, ergo "human" rights. If you want to say that comes from god, that's your business. But god didn't have a damn thing to do with it from my perspective, or from the perspective of the constitution, which does not mention god anywhere in the text.

...and if you had read the other thread, you would have understood the argument instead of stepping on a rake in a cartoonish fashion.

_________________
"I unsettle all things. No facts are to me sacred; none are profane; I simply experiment, an endless seeker with no past at my back." - Ralph Waldo Emerson

Calling it quits? We are the Message Board Whores. Get used to it.
The Reason for the Decline


Last edited by RAnthony on Fri Feb 10, 2012 4:59 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Dan Carlin & Rick Santorum; seperated at birth?
PostPosted: Thu Feb 09, 2012 5:50 pm 
Offline
Hetairoi
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 01, 2008 7:11 pm
Posts: 5250
Location: I am from TX, I love TX, I hate TX, and if I am buried anywhere but TX my grave will become TX.
Asking anyone, including extreme masochists, to reread a thread in these forums that involves religion is, and I am using only the slightest hyperbole here, a hate crime.

Just sayin.

_________________
Or maybe I just have a small penis and it explains everything... ~ davver

“Sometimes the truth is arrived at by adding all the little lies together and deducting them from the totality of what is known.”

~Terry Pratchett, Going Postal


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Dan Carlin & Rick Santorum; seperated at birth?
PostPosted: Thu Feb 09, 2012 6:06 pm 
Offline
Hetairoi
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 16, 2007 10:27 pm
Posts: 5080
Location: Austin, Texas
I linked it for a reason. Boethius on the other hand, read the thread in question, because he posted in it. He apparently simply prefers to be comical.

_________________
"I unsettle all things. No facts are to me sacred; none are profane; I simply experiment, an endless seeker with no past at my back." - Ralph Waldo Emerson

Calling it quits? We are the Message Board Whores. Get used to it.
The Reason for the Decline


Last edited by RAnthony on Thu Feb 09, 2012 11:05 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Dan Carlin & Rick Santorum; seperated at birth?
PostPosted: Thu Feb 09, 2012 7:39 pm 
Offline
Satrap
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 21, 2011 8:43 pm
Posts: 2757
Location: New Zealand
Quote:
“They are taking faith and crushing it. Why? Why? When you marginalize faith in America, when you remove the pillar of God given rights then what’s left?” Santorum asked and an audience member offered, “Communism!”



Ah that is funny, remove religion from a country and you get Communism HA. Actually i was involved in that thread, and Dan stated that he meant nothing by it, it was a throw away line like "God Damn".

_________________
Whats that? A YouTube Channel? Don't worry there isn't a video about Politics or Religion in sight (or on the channel).

http://www.youtube.com/user/Runicmadhamster


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Dan Carlin & Rick Santorum; seperated at birth?
PostPosted: Thu Feb 09, 2012 8:07 pm 
Offline
Satrap
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 21, 2011 8:43 pm
Posts: 2757
Location: New Zealand
Discount the above posts feeble attempts to defend Dan because i have a better way. Recently i have been listening to a lot of Hitchens debates about religion, in them he is often asked alot of questions about why famous scientist used the word god, his response was that it proves how primitive our language is that we don't have a better word to better describe things that are so awe inspiring. I would say that Dans use of the term "God given rights" shows that our language is primitive, Dan didn't mean a all powerful celestial dictator when he said God, he meant some thing that goes above human laws.

_________________
Whats that? A YouTube Channel? Don't worry there isn't a video about Politics or Religion in sight (or on the channel).

http://www.youtube.com/user/Runicmadhamster


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Dan Carlin & Rick Santorum; seperated at birth?
PostPosted: Thu Feb 09, 2012 8:12 pm 
Offline
Hetairoi
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 30, 2010 3:50 pm
Posts: 7299
Runicmadhamster wrote:
Discount the above posts feeble attempts to defend Dan because i have a better way. Recently i have been listening to a lot of Hitchens debates about religion, in them he is often asked alot of questions about why famous scientist used the word god, his response was that it proves how primitive our language is that we don't have a better word to better describe things that are so awe inspiring. I would say that Dans use of the term "God given rights" shows that our language is primitive, Dan didn't mean a all powerful celestial dictator when he said God, he meant some thing that goes above human laws.


You mean like "awe-some"?

Quote:
awe·some
 adjective
1. inspiring awe: an awesome sight.
2. showing or characterized by awe.
3. Slang . very impressive: That new white convertible is totally awesome.


Time to reclaim the word from these guys:

Image

_________________
"Yuck factor aside (along with the potential for the animal to harm the human), if the animal isn't being harmed I'm not sure why bestiality should be a felony." -- drtrech

"Boethius was the only user here to successfully piss me off IRL, and you'll notice it's been crickets from him for a while. I'm not saying he's dead now . . . but . . . :twisted:" -- DBTrek

"How about you just suck on a cyanide lollipop and spare us your fucking hyperbole you whining little nancy?" -- Cid

"If Dan had a lick of sense he'd have booted your pompous ass ages ago." - RAnthony


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Dan Carlin & Rick Santorum; seperated at birth?
PostPosted: Thu Feb 09, 2012 8:20 pm 
Offline
Satrap
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 21, 2011 8:43 pm
Posts: 2757
Location: New Zealand
boethius wrote:
Runicmadhamster wrote:
Discount the above posts feeble attempts to defend Dan because i have a better way. Recently i have been listening to a lot of Hitchens debates about religion, in them he is often asked alot of questions about why famous scientist used the word god, his response was that it proves how primitive our language is that we don't have a better word to better describe things that are so awe inspiring. I would say that Dans use of the term "God given rights" shows that our language is primitive, Dan didn't mean a all powerful celestial dictator when he said God, he meant some thing that goes above human laws.


You mean like "awe-some"?

Quote:
awe·some
 adjective
1. inspiring awe: an awesome sight.
2. showing or characterized by awe.
3. Slang . very impressive: That new white convertible is totally awesome.


Time to reclaim the word from these guys:

Image


OK maybe awesome wasnt the best word to use, prehaps Dan can elaborate.

_________________
Whats that? A YouTube Channel? Don't worry there isn't a video about Politics or Religion in sight (or on the channel).

http://www.youtube.com/user/Runicmadhamster


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Dan Carlin & Rick Santorum; seperated at birth?
PostPosted: Thu Feb 09, 2012 8:29 pm 
Offline
Hetairoi
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 30, 2010 3:50 pm
Posts: 7299
Runicmadhamster wrote:
Dan didn't mean a all powerful celestial dictator when he said God, he meant some thing that goes above human laws.

I'm genuinely interested in an atheist's opinion about what this "thing" is.

_________________
"Yuck factor aside (along with the potential for the animal to harm the human), if the animal isn't being harmed I'm not sure why bestiality should be a felony." -- drtrech

"Boethius was the only user here to successfully piss me off IRL, and you'll notice it's been crickets from him for a while. I'm not saying he's dead now . . . but . . . :twisted:" -- DBTrek

"How about you just suck on a cyanide lollipop and spare us your fucking hyperbole you whining little nancy?" -- Cid

"If Dan had a lick of sense he'd have booted your pompous ass ages ago." - RAnthony


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Dan Carlin & Rick Santorum; seperated at birth?
PostPosted: Thu Feb 09, 2012 8:35 pm 
Offline
Satrap
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 21, 2011 8:43 pm
Posts: 2757
Location: New Zealand
boethius wrote:
Runicmadhamster wrote:
Dan didn't mean a all powerful celestial dictator when he said God, he meant some thing that goes above human laws.

I'm genuinely interested in an atheist's opinion about what this "thing" is.



Well like Hitchens said (and this is only my view, it may not be the view of the others) our vocabulary isn't evolved enough for me to properly describe what the thing it, it often leaves atheists borrowing from the theists vocabulary because, while we don't believe in god, we dont have a word that has the weight of the word god. I suppose in relation to your question it refers to rights that have been with humanity since we first became socially aware animals, that's a piss poor way of describing it but its the best i can do.

_________________
Whats that? A YouTube Channel? Don't worry there isn't a video about Politics or Religion in sight (or on the channel).

http://www.youtube.com/user/Runicmadhamster


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Dan Carlin & Rick Santorum; seperated at birth?
PostPosted: Thu Feb 09, 2012 8:41 pm 
Offline
Contributing Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2011 10:09 am
Posts: 494
Am I missing something or is he saying that rights can't exist without religion and using the pre-revolutionary French Monarchy as his example?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Dan Carlin & Rick Santorum; seperated at birth?
PostPosted: Thu Feb 09, 2012 11:16 pm 
Offline
Hetairoi
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 16, 2007 10:27 pm
Posts: 5080
Location: Austin, Texas
sventoby wrote:
Am I missing something or is he saying that rights can't exist without religion and using the pre-revolutionary French Monarchy as his example?
That's what he is saying, yes. That is the argument that relying on phrases such as 'god given rights' enables.

Hamster and Dan are both OK with enabling these types of bullshit arguments, as well. More than happy to use 'throw away' phrases and tiptoe around the religious and the clueless (damn repeating myself again) for fear of upsetting too many people, I guess.

Human rights or Emergent principles of human nature; they are essential parts of what makes us human, and therefore cannot be removed from us as long as we live. they are by there very nature greater than law, greater than a bronze age prayer-answering skyman even, because they predate both those concepts and the language they are formed from. We cannot be human without them. One might even go so far as to suggest that you cannot be human if you deny them...

_________________
"I unsettle all things. No facts are to me sacred; none are profane; I simply experiment, an endless seeker with no past at my back." - Ralph Waldo Emerson

Calling it quits? We are the Message Board Whores. Get used to it.
The Reason for the Decline


Last edited by RAnthony on Fri Feb 10, 2012 4:57 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Dan Carlin & Rick Santorum; seperated at birth?
PostPosted: Fri Feb 10, 2012 12:48 am 
Offline
Satrap
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 21, 2011 8:43 pm
Posts: 2757
Location: New Zealand
RAnthony wrote:
sventoby wrote:
Am I missing something or is he saying that rights can't exist without religion and using the pre-revolutionary French Monarchy as his example?
That's what he is saying, yes. That is the argument that relying on phrases such as 'god given rights' enables.

Hamster and Dan are both OK with enabling these types of bullshit arguments, as well. More than happy to use 'throw away' phrases and tiptoe around the religious and the clueless (damn repeating myself again) for fear of upsetting too many people, I guess.

Human rights or Emergent principals of human nature; they are essential parts of what makes us human, and therefore cannot be removed from us as long as we live. they are by there very nature greater than law, greater than a bronze age prayer-answering skyman even, because they predate both those concepts and the language they are formed from. We cannot be human without them. One might even go so far as to suggest that you cannot be human if you deny them...


Did you read my post, or just assume it was bullshit.

_________________
Whats that? A YouTube Channel? Don't worry there isn't a video about Politics or Religion in sight (or on the channel).

http://www.youtube.com/user/Runicmadhamster


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Dan Carlin & Rick Santorum; seperated at birth?
PostPosted: Fri Feb 10, 2012 1:20 am 
Offline
Hetairoi
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 16, 2007 10:27 pm
Posts: 5080
Location: Austin, Texas
Yes. You offered the argument that Dan was too lazy to actually craft language that didn't give cover to nutcases like Santorum. Two different version of the same argument. When Hitchens spoke, you'll notice that he didn't make the same lazy mistakes.

_________________
"I unsettle all things. No facts are to me sacred; none are profane; I simply experiment, an endless seeker with no past at my back." - Ralph Waldo Emerson

Calling it quits? We are the Message Board Whores. Get used to it.
The Reason for the Decline


Last edited by RAnthony on Fri Feb 10, 2012 4:56 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  


Post new topic Reply to topic

All times are UTC - 8 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 4 guests

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group


Home l Common Sense l Hardcore History l Donate l Community l Merchandise l Blog l About Us